Barrett Garese
link

marco:

Just hours after Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski proposed expanding the network neutrality authority of the agency Sept. 21, Senate Republicans moved to block the initiative. Using an appropriations bill as a vehicle, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison introduced an amendment that would deny the FCC any funds for developing or implementing new Internet regulations.

Of course.

Let me be crystal clear: if you oppose Net Neutrality you’re supporting negating the very existence of the single most transformative technology of the past two millennia.  You’re supporting allowing private industry to arbitrarily change the open access rules which have allowed the evolution of human communications to make huge leaps, and you’re not doing it because you agree or disagree with the policy, but because you’re playing party politics.

Now normally, I’m in favor of staying out of local elections if you’re not actually local, but I’ll make an exception here for two reasons: First, the internet is global so you’re actually legislating on much more than just your local constituency.  Secondly, you’re interfering with my workplace and my livelihood - not to mention fucking with the future of international communications and creativity.  All of a sudden the maxim “all politics is local” will take on a whole new meaning.

So it comes down to this: If you oppose Net Neutrality I’ll do everything in my power - small as my sphere of influence may seem - to keep you out of any elected office. That effort may amount to doing my damnedest to make sure you don’t get re-elected, or it may be trying to get you actively kicked out of office but the fact remains that I will be a thorn in your side and a constant pain in your ass.

Your worldview is valuing one private industry’s profits and party politics higher than maintaining the precidents that allowed the largest shift in human communications, information, commerce, and entertainment in the history of our species.  You’re not just fucking with my business, you’re fucking with the future - and you don’t even have a good goddamn reason aside from “I’m a Republican, this is what we do.”

But let’s get back on track: If this sounds petty, remember: you’re firing a shot across my bow, and this is mine in return.  I don’t know how many will help me, but I’m damn sure I’ll know where to find them.  And in the meantime, I’ll be doing my research on what the most effective way to ruin your world is - as you seem to be doing your best to ruin mine.

Barrett Garese

  1. bringmethathorizon reblogged this from think4yourself
  2. nerdgasms reblogged this from leftunderbooks
  3. leftunderbooks reblogged this from think4yourself
  4. thingatude reblogged this from think4yourself and added:
    Also interesting, since the argument I’ve heard against Net Neutrality is that it will “stifle innovation.” I just can’t...
  5. think4yourself reblogged this from robot-heart-politics and added:
    Funny since it is the Internet that has allowed the fringe wings of the GOP party (birthers, deathers, tenthers) to...
  6. robot-heart-politics reblogged this from notthatkindagay and added:
    notthatkindagay:
  7. ad7am reblogged this from marco
  8. mknell reblogged this from soupsoup
  9. megabytes reblogged this from spytap
  10. gbattle reblogged this from marco and added:
    gbattle sez: This is simply a policy maneuver promulgated by GOP Luddites parroting words whispered to them by the likes...
  11. resurrecthobbes reblogged this from notthatkindagay and added:
    http://www.lipmantimes.com/?author=18 I’ll be covering this more at a later date!
  12. cyn1cal reblogged this from notthatkindagay and added:
    WOW THIS IS TERRIBLE. There is absolutely no damn reason that anyone should be trying to block this legislation. We need...
  13. notthatkindagay reblogged this from onionvolcano and added:
    You’re not wrong. They’re using this as a way to raise money from the telecom, cable and internet providers. Also,...
  14. onionvolcano reblogged this from soupsoup and added:
    Why do I feel like no conservatives understand this idea? I mean, nobody: not the “base,” not their representatives?...
  15. soupsoup reblogged this from tanya77
  16. mlee525 reblogged this from tanya77
  17. tanya77 reblogged this from spytap and added:
    I’m telling you, I can really get behind a group that wants to limit people’s freedom of expression and never supply...
  18. rillawafers reblogged this from spytap
  19. jaybushman reblogged this from spytap
  20. catmansmuckers reblogged this from spytap
  21. infoneer-pulse reblogged this from marco
  22. gregleding reblogged this from marco
  23. chrisdannen reblogged this from marco
  24. sivadcm reblogged this from spytap and added:
    I completely agree. If passed this will stifle so much innovation and development from those who are not in giant...
  25. shorterexcerpts reblogged this from gregb and added:
    They’ve only got 40 seats—this shouldn’t go anywhere. Shouldn’t.
  26. spytap reblogged this from marco and added:
    Let me be crystal clear: if you oppose Net Neutrality you’re supporting negating the very existence of the single most...
  27. gregb reblogged this from marco
  28. falconieri reblogged this from marco and added:
    I’m sick of the way you’ve made the populace stupid. Around a fifth of your populace thinks the sun orbits the earth,...
  29. marco posted this
blog comments powered by Disqus