Barrett Garese

  • Essays And Rants
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Blip.tv
  • Spytap Industries
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything

It’s been known since 12/28 that Umar Abdulmutallab had a round trip ticket and not a one-way fare.

ericmortensen:

So why have the AP, WSJ, WaPo, CNN, Fox, Time, Newsweek, New York Times (at least they ran a correction), Boston Globe, Gannett, PIttsburgh Tribune Review, Sacramento Bee, Globe and Mail, Washington Times and Congressional Quarterly all said differently? And when will they stop?

(via TPMMuckraker)

“News” is not immune to the power of memes either. “News” isn’t really news anymore - a common complaint, and not one that I’m unique in offering - it’s entertainment. There’s a certain small amount of investigative journalism going on in this country, but more than anything else it’s just repetition of the prevalent opinions.

I don’t want to go into whether the “corporate” structure of news media is affecting this, or whether or not the myth of the “liberal media” has anything to do with it (news flash: an individual media outlet is only as liberal as the multinational corporate conglomerate that owns it) but I think it’s clear that the biggest myth of all is that of the lone crusading journalist; the hardworking mix of gumshoe and writer, independently pursuing hard leads and the merest wisps of information alike in an effort to reveal an unbiased account of “the truth.” Or perhaps the myth isn’t of that person’s existence, but of whether or not we’d listen to them if they did.

NYT during the run up to Iraq, Fox News at all times, the rise of “opinion personalities” as news sources, the evidence is around us all the time. “Just the facts, ma’am” feels quaint because it is - it’s a sign of a time long since passed. More and more, facts hold no sway with people unless they confirm an already-held belief.

We have the greatest and most complete repository of human knowledge that our civilization has ever known, and in a perfect world it would allow “the truth” to be self-evident most of the time - or at least allow us to become better at researching as opposed to just blindly accepting information from The Powers That Be. What it’s actually done is reinforce human nature’s inherent ability to mentally distort facts to support an already believed perception and granted “facts” the same sort of wiggle room as “opinion.”

In an age where we should be smarter and better informed than any generation in history, little things like “the age of the earth,” “is there a scientific consensus on global warming,” and “whether or not the President is a citizen” are somehow in dispute. Facts hold no sway anymore, because this entertainmentization (not a real word…until now) of what used to be strictly informational necessitates an opposing side for all issues - even when the issue itself does not require or warrant it.

Fact: The Earth is not 6,000 years old, but closer to 4.6 billion years old. If your book says differently then your book is wrong.

Fact: There is a scientific consensus on man-made global warming - to the tune of 97% - if your news anchor says differently then they are wrong.

Fact: The President was born in Hawaii. His birth certificate is on the internet and there are news articles from the time period announcing his birth. If your “opinion journalist” says differently then they are wrong.

If you dispute any of the above, please provide evidence, not opinion, and they will be reevaluated. Your opinion on the matter is unimportant. Your “emotions” on the issue are not only unimportant but have no place in any discussion of science or fact. Your “beliefs” should resonate with - and have backing from - factual, demonstrable bases.

Facts should be able to stand on their own merits against all surrounding attacks, but whether this assault on reason is premeditated in an effort to discredit the very foundations of the concept of truth, or whether it’s a result of the idea that all opinions are created equal (they’re not) is unimportant. The result is what’s important, and the simple and indisputable truth is that logic, reason, and science hold less sway on the overall American population than they used to.

At one point, my country was founded with the words “We hold these truths to be self-evident…”

Do we still?

Source: ericmortensen

    • #politics
    • #rants
    • #science
  • 2 years ago > ericmortensen
  • 25
  • Comments
  • Permalink
  • Share
    Tweet

25 Notes/ Hide

  1. triskaidecagon liked this
  2. tywillis liked this
  3. rebeccalando liked this
  4. gregleding reblogged this from soupsoup
  5. fantasticmrjon liked this
  6. headphonesnotrequired reblogged this from spytap and added:
    Reblogging because I think what Barrett says is really smart.
  7. kevintwohy liked this
  8. justinalcon liked this
  9. kellysutton reblogged this from mikehudack
  10. realitybitesss reblogged this from soupsoup
  11. bronwynlewis liked this
  12. spytap reblogged this from ericmortensen and added:
    “News” is not immune to...power of memes either. “News” isn’t really news anymore - a...
  13. mdt liked this
  14. soupsoup reblogged this from ericmortensen
  15. oblast reblogged this from takethecityandrun
  16. tsparks liked this
  17. texteinvitatiinunta liked this
  18. section9 liked this
  19. mikehudack reblogged this from ericmortensen
  20. gracenmichelle reblogged this from ericmortensen
  21. takethecityandrun reblogged this from ericmortensen
  22. ericmortensen posted this

Recent comments

Blog comments powered by Disqus
← Previous • Next →

About

I do lots of things. I'm kind of weird that way.

First and foremost, I'm the Director of Content Partnerships at Blip.tv, where you can discover the best in original web series.

Before that, I ran a consulting company focused on entertainment and government entities called Spytap Industries. In a previous life I helped create United Talent Agency's online division - the first major agency division devoted to representing and monetizing online content.

I also contribute to Here's Some Awesome, a collaborative video curation site that showcases the awesome in online video.

From time to time I write essays on topics of interest from politics, to the future of mass media, to the effects that online content and piracy are having on traditional media. They normally go here. (Latest example: "On Wikileaks")

This is my personal blog, So while it probably doesn't need to be said, all of the opinions here are solely my own or those of the people I reblog.

Email me: Spytap at spytap dot net

Ask Me (Almost) Anything

Me, Elsewhere

  • @spytap on Twitter
  • Facebook Profile
  • spytap on Foursquare
  • My Skype Info
  • Linkedin Profile

Twitter

loading tweets…

Following

  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Mobile

Effector Theme by Carlo Franco.

Powered by Tumblr